Short answer
A wiring fault first, then the purge valve
A P0443 code is an electrical test result. The computer sent a signal to the purge valve and didn't see the current it expected, so the OBD-II system filed a circuit fault. It says nothing about whether fuel vapor is flowing, and that decides whether the first thing you buy is a part or a multimeter: the valve behind it is $65 at a Ford counter and $172 fitted as a national average.
OilAndMiles.com - Every page that explains a P0443 code puts the purge valve first. That's understandable, because the valve is what the code names, and it's cheap. It's also the reason the same code gets fixed twice.
The federal rule behind on-board diagnostics doesn't check one thing about the evaporative system. It checks four, and they're different in kind. A P0443 code is the car reporting on the first of them, and the other three are where most of the money gets spent.
So the useful question isn't what to replace. It's which of the four tests failed, and what that rules out. If your code is a leak code instead, P0456 is the small-leak test and behaves nothing like this one.
Which of the four tests does P0443 come from?
The rule requires the computer to check the evaporative system's components for circuit continuity, out-of-range values, rationality, and proper functional response. The rule lists those as examples rather than as a closed set, but they're four separate accusations, and the EVAP codes an owner meets belong to one of them.
Circuit continuity is the simplest, and it's the one P0443 belongs to. The computer drives the purge valve's solenoid and watches the current on that circuit. An open coil, a short to ground or a short to power all produce a reading that doesn't match the state it commanded, and that's the whole test.
What follows from that is the part nobody writes down. A circuit test can't see vapor. It can't know whether the valve opened, whether the hose is split, or whether the canister is saturated.
Those belong to the other three tests, and they carry their own codes. P0441 is the flow accusation. P0446 and P0449 belong to the vent valve at the other end of the system.
| The test | Codes | What the computer actually did |
|---|---|---|
| Circuit continuity | P0443, P0449 | An electrical reading. The module drives the solenoid and watches the current: open coil, short to ground, short to power. It never sees vapor |
| Out of range | P0452, P0453 | The tank pressure sensor is reporting a number that isn't physically possible, low or high. Nothing has been concluded about the tank |
| Rationality | P0451 | The reading is possible on its own and wrong next to everything else the car knows. The subtle one, and the hardest to chase |
| Proper functional response | P0441, P0446, P0496 | The computer commanded a change, watched for it, and didn't get it. The wiring can be perfect and this still fails |
| Not one of the four | P0455, P0442, P0456 | The leak codes. One test at three hole sizes, and the only group where a loose gas cap is a common answer |
We went to the rule for these four rather than to a code list, because the lists give each code a page of its own and that's exactly what hides which test it came from. P0443 is the first row. A smoke test looks for the last row, which is why it's the wrong first move on this code.
Worth knowing
One page currently on the first results page for this code lists vacuum leaks in the EVAP system as a cause of P0443, reasoning that the computer misreads valve operation as a circuit fault.
That can't happen. A leak is a pressure finding and this is an electrical one, and the two monitors don't share a result.
A hole in a hose will set a leak code, and it will do nothing to the current in a solenoid winding. If a shop offers a smoke test as the first step on a bare P0443, that's a test for a different code.
Why is the valve the second thing to check?
Because the circuit it sits on fails the same test, and everything else on that circuit is cheaper to rule out. The purge valve is a solenoid: a coil of wire that pulls a plunger when it's energized. When the coil itself fails open, the circuit test fails and replacing the valve fixes it.
That case is real and it's common.
But the same test fails for everything else on that circuit, and none of it is inside the valve. A blown fuse feeding the solenoid, a corroded connector, a chafed wire against a bracket, or the driver inside the computer that switches the circuit. All of them produce the identical code, and one of them costs nothing to rule out.
Owners describing this code on marque forums report both outcomes in roughly equal measure. The distinction they draw is worth borrowing: the ones who tested the circuit first knew which they had before they bought anything.
What the data says
Twelve filings name the code. Widen it to the part the code is about, and the record gets big enough to read: 1,335 complaints name a purge valve or purge solenoid, and one make holds three quarters of them:
- Ford, 991. That is 74% of every purge valve complaint filed. The Focus alone is 487, the Fusion 181 and the Escape 160.
- Chevrolet, 94. 7%, led by the Traverse at 33.
- Everyone else, 250. Volkswagen 41, Kia 25, Jeep 24, Hyundai 21, and a long tail below that.
Counts aren't rates: Ford sells a lot of cars and files a lot of complaints about everything. But a single make holding three quarters of one component's record is a wider margin than volume alone explains, and no page on the first results page for this code publishes it.
Counted from NHTSA's public complaints bulk file, deduplicated by complaint number, model years 2010 to 2025, matching complaint text that names a purge valve or purge solenoid. That measures the part, not the code: a complaint here may have been a flow code or a stuck valve rather than P0443. Owner-filed, not workshop-confirmed.
What owners report
Across threads on Nissan, Chevrolet and Ford marque forums, the repair that ends the code splits three ways:
- The valve. Replaced, and the code cleared.
- A broken wire inside the connector shell. The valve tested fine and went back in.
- The connector itself. One thread names a connector part number rather than a valve.
The test they pass around is the same one in every thread: put twelve volts across the solenoid and listen. A valve that clicks and passes air when energized, and holds when it's not, has a working coil, and the fault is somewhere else on the circuit.
Threads on Club Frontier, Nico Club, Silverado Sierra, the Chevy Malibu forum and the 2013+ Ford Escape forum, read August 29, 2026. Owner reporting, not verified repairs.
What is the computer actually measuring?
Manufacturers publish the thresholds, and they make the electrical nature of this test concrete. On one Ford application, a 2011 F-150 with the 3.7-liter V6, the module monitors its own output driver and fails the test when the signal moves outside the minimum or maximum limit for the state it commanded.
The figures attached to it are ordinary electrical ones. With the valve commanded closed the current reads zero and the voltage sits at about battery voltage. Commanded fully open, the current reads 1,000 milliamps and a voltage drop of at least three volts is normal.
Nothing in that description involves fuel vapor.
Use this image
Free to republish under CC BY 4.0: credit Oil & Miles and link to this page. The snippet does both.
<a href="https://oilandmiles.com/articles/p0443-code"><img src="https://oilandmiles.com/assets/img/diagrams/p0443-one-circuit.svg" alt="Line diagram of the purge valve circuit drawn as one continuous loop: battery feed, fuse, connector, the solenoid winding inside the purge valve, and back into the engine computer's output driver and down to ground. Six numbered faults sit on the loop: 1 the power circuit open, 2 the control circuit shorted to ground, 3 the control circuit open, 4 the control circuit shorted to a live wire, 5 the valve coil, 6 the module driver. One ammeter inside the computer watches the whole loop. The valve's two vapor nipples carry broken-line stubs, marked as not measured" width="1000" height="720"></a> <p>Diagram: <a href="https://oilandmiles.com/articles/p0443-code">Oil & Miles</a>, CC BY 4.0</p>Ford's own list of conditions that set the code on that truck is a list of wiring faults: power circuit open, control circuit shorted to ground, control circuit open, control circuit shorted to voltage, damaged valve, damaged module. The valve is one entry out of six.
What does P0443:00 mean on a Chevrolet?
The same thing P0443 means anywhere else. GM scan data commonly displays this code as P0443:00, or written as P0443-00, and it reads like a code of its own.
It isn't. Those two extra digits are a failure type byte, the standardized subtype set that SAE J2012 places in its J2012-DA annex, and they apply only where three-byte codes are in use. The base code in front of them is the circuit test described above.
We don't give a meaning for the value 00 itself, because those definitions live in that annex and we haven't read it. What matters for a repair decision is that the suffix changes nothing about what the car measured: a Chevrolet showing P0443:00 has failed the same current check as a Ford showing a bare P0443, and the same order applies. Test the circuit before buying the valve.
What does a P0443 cost, and where does the money go?
The part is cheap on a Ford and the catalogues say so. Ford lists its purge valve at $65 on both the Explorer and the Escape, and the same Motorcraft part is $33 mail order. One current part number supersedes seven older ones, so a Ford from the last fifteen years is unlikely to need anything unusual.
Nissan lists the equivalent for an Altima at $231, which is more than the national average for the finished repair on any car.
The national average for the finished repair is $172. That figure comes from a count of repairs actually recommended rather than from an estimate generator, and on the same list it is the sixth most common check engine repair in the country, at 4.93% of them.
The gap is the point. About $107 of that average isn't the part. It is diagnosis and labor, and on a circuit code diagnosis is most of the work: the test is a meter reading, and the answer decides whether the valve is even involved.
Paying for the diagnosis and skipping the wrong part is the cheaper order.
Which car you drive moves the part price more than the part itself does. On the three cars this code is searched for most, the cheapest valve listed for an Altima costs more than the dearest one listed for either Ford:
| Car | Cheapest | Dearest | Brands listed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Ford Explorer 3.5L V6 | $18 | $33 | Nine, Dorman up to Motorcraft, which is Ford's own brand |
| 2015 Ford Escape 2.5L L4 | $18 | $41 | Ten, Dorman up to VEMO, with Motorcraft, Ford's own brand, between them |
| 2015 Nissan Altima 2.5L | $57 | $81 | Six, Beck/Arnley up to MotoRad. No Nissan-branded valve is listed |
Source: RockAuto, every brand listed as fitting each car, read September 14, 2026. Rounded to the dollar.
Nobody on the first page of results for this code names a part number, a catalogue or a car. The ranges they publish, $80 to $400, are estimates of an estimate.
What a P0443 code costs, one repair seen three ways
The rows are one repair seen three ways rather than four things to buy, so there's no total.
| Purge valve – DealerThe maker's own part at the dealer counter, one number per car. Ford lists it at the same price on both of its cars; Nissan lists the equivalent at three and a half times that.2015 Ford Explorer 3.5L V6 · $65, part AU5Z-9C915-E2015 Ford Escape 2.5L L4 · $65, part 9U5Z-9C915-H2015 Nissan Altima 2.5L L4 · $231, part 14930-JA10D | $65 – $231Part only, at the counter |
|---|---|
| Purge valve – Mail orderWhat the valve costs moves with the car more than with the brand. Every brand listed for each one.2015 Ford Explorer 3.5L V6 · $18 to $33, 2015 Ford Escape 2.5L L4 · $18 to $41, 2015 Nissan Altima 2.5L L4 · $57 to $81, | $18 – $81Part only, mail order |
| Diagnosis and laborWhat is left once the part is paid for, and where a circuit code lives | about $107Labor only, US average |
| EVAP canister purge control valveNational average across 39,116,755 repairs recommended in 2025 | $172Parts and labor, US average |
Dealer list prices are the makers' own catalogues; the mail-order figures are RockAuto, every brand listed for a 2015 Explorer 3.5L, a 2015 Escape 2.5L and a 2015 Altima 2.5L, read September 14, 2026. The national average is CarMD Vehicle Health Index 2026. Part numbers, the two parts left out and why are in Sources. The rows are one repair seen several ways rather than things to buy, so there's no total: $65 plus $107 is the $172.
Can you drive with a P0443 code?
Yes, and not indefinitely. Two of the four questions Google lists as most asked about this code are about exactly this, and the pages answering them say some version of get it fixed soon. That's not an answer.
Mechanically, a purge circuit fault isn't a reason to stop. There's no oil pressure consequence, no cooling consequence and nothing that gets more expensive per mile the way a slipping transmission does. Most cars with this code drive normally and their owners notice nothing.
There are three real consequences, and none of them is mechanical damage:
- An emissions test failure. A lit lamp is an automatic fail wherever your state runs one, regardless of what set it.
- A second failure on the same test. The EVAP readiness monitor, the car's own record that it has finished checking that system, won't complete while the fault stands. States that check monitors fail you for that as well.
- The lamp is now busy. A check engine light already on can't warn you about the next fault, and the next one may be a fault that does matter.
You'll have met a different answer before this one. The list page one publishes for this code, and the one Google's own summary repeats, runs rough idling, poor fuel economy and stalling. That list isn't wrong so much as unsorted.
Those are things a purge valve does while it's passing vapor the engine didn't ask for, and the circuit test behind P0443 never sees vapor. Most faults on this circuit leave the valve shut, and a shut valve is invisible from the driver's seat.
Two cases put a symptom back on this code:
- A valve stuck open. The mechanical one. It lets vapor into the intake whether the engine asked for it or not, and owners describe a rough idle and hard starting after refueling.
- A control wire shorted to ground. The electrical one, and it follows from the readings above rather than from Ford's own wording. The module switches the ground side of a solenoid fed battery voltage, which is why a valve commanded closed reads zero current at about battery voltage. A wire grounded on that side does what the module does, and holds the valve open while the engine runs. It's one of the six faults on this circuit, and the only one that drives the way the list says.
If either is what you have, the code has a symptom, and the symptom is the reason to move.
What does the complaint record say?
Owners can file a complaint with the federal regulator about any fault, and those filings are public. Across 645,169 complaints on 2010 to 2025 model years, twelve name this code.
Twelve isn't a failure rate and it's not a ranking. What it measures is how many people cared enough to file, and an emissions code with no symptom gives almost nobody a reason to. The absence is worth stating rather than dressing up.
One detail inside those twelve is worth having anyway. Ford holds seven of them, spread across the Focus, Escape and Fusion.
Chevrolet holds four, and all four are the Volt. One model, one code, and the Volt is a plug-in hybrid whose engine runs intermittently, which is a different duty cycle for a purge system than a car that runs its engine all the time.
That's a lead, not a finding. Four complaints can't carry a conclusion, and we're not going to pretend otherwise.
| Make | Filings | What that is |
|---|---|---|
| Ford | 7 | Focus 4, Escape 2, Fusion 1. Ford also files more complaints than any other make about everything, so a raw count flatters it |
| Chevrolet | 4 | All four are the Volt: one model, and a plug-in hybrid whose engine runs intermittently is a different duty cycle for a purge valve |
| Jeep | 1 | Grand Cherokee. One filing is one owner, and nothing more than that |
| Every other make | 0 | Twenty-five makes appear in this data set with EVAP complaints. None of them names this code once |
Source: NHTSA consumer complaints, bulk file published 25 August 2026, model years 2010 to 2025.
Is P0443 different on a Dodge or a Honda?
No, and the reason is worth knowing before you search for a make-specific fix. The code is defined by a regulation rather than by a manufacturer. The same rule the EPA accepts in place of its own applies to every car sold in the United States, so the accusation behind P0443 is identical on a Ram, an Accord and an F-150: the module drove the solenoid and the current came back wrong.
The complaint record says the same thing from the other side. Searches pair this code with a make constantly; the filings don't. Of the twelve, seven are Ford, four are Chevrolet and one is a Jeep, and not one is a Dodge or a Honda.
Twelve filings are too few to sort by badge, so widen it to the part. Across 1,335 complaints naming a purge valve on 2010 to 2025 model years, Dodge is 6 and Honda is 14. Between them that is 1.5%, against Ford's 991.
So the answer holds from both directions, and the wider count is the stronger one: it isn't that the record is too small to show a Dodge, it's that the record is large and Dodge is barely in it. What that measures is the part rather than the code, since a complaint naming a purge valve may have been a flow code or a stuck valve.
What does change by make is the part number and what a dealer charges for it. The circuit test above doesn't change at all.
What should you do about a P0443 code?
Four steps for settling whether this is a wire or a valve before anyone sells you the valve. The first two are free. 4 steps below:
- Read every code, not just this one. A flow code such as P0441, or a leak code such as P0455 or P0456 sitting beside it, changes what you're looking at. Reading codes is free at most US parts chains.
- Check the fuse feeding the purge solenoid. It is the cheapest thing on the circuit and it fails the same test as everything else. Your owner's manual has the fuse box diagram.
- Test the circuit with a meter before buying a valve. The valve sits in the purge line between the charcoal canister and the intake, and it's the only part in that line with an electrical connector on it; where exactly that falls differs by car. Twelve volts across the solenoid should produce an audible click and airflow while energized. A coil that reads open is the valve. A coil that works means the fault is in the wiring, the connector or the module driver.
- Inspect the connector and the wire where it moves. Corroded pins and a wire chafed against a bracket are what owners report finding most often after the valve turns out to be fine.
If the code comes back after a valve replacement, the valve was never the fault. That is the outcome this order is written to avoid, and it's the reason reading the whole set of codes comes first.
From the documents
What does the regulation actually require?
Two separate jobs, and this code belongs to the second. The rule the EPA accepts in place of its own runs to 81 pages, and the paragraph that decides this article is four lines long.
13 CCR 1968.2 (e)(4.1), OBD II final regulation order
The OBD II system shall verify purge flow from the evaporative system and shall monitor the complete evaporative system … for vapor leaks to the atmosphere. Individual components of the evaporative system (e.g. valves, sensors, etc.) shall be monitored in accordance with the comprehensive components requirements in section (e)(16) (e.g., for circuit continuity, out of range values, rationality, proper functional response, etc.).
13 CCR 1968.2 (e)(4.2.2), the system malfunctions
No purge flow from the evaporative system to the engine can be detected … The complete evaporative system contains a leak or leaks that cumulatively are greater than or equal to a leak caused by a 0.040 inch diameter orifice … or a 0.020 inch diameter orifice.
- The split is written into the rule, not inferred from it. System leaks and purge flow are one requirement; component circuits are a different one, routed to a different section.
- The four accusations are the regulation's own examples, not a closed list. It writes
e.g.
andetc.
around them, so treat four as the useful shape rather than the complete set. - The orifice sizes belong to the leak tests. A smoke test answers (4.2.2)(B) and (C). It has nothing to offer a circuit code.
Which is the whole argument of this page, in the regulator's own sentence rather than ours.
Conclusion
The valve is the second thing to check
A P0443 code is one of four evaporative tests, and it's the electrical one. It says the circuit failed a current check, and nothing about vapor. That is why every page that opens with the purge valve is answering a question the code didn't ask.
The order that follows from it is cheap and it's short: read every code, check the fuse, put twelve volts across the solenoid, then look at the connector. A valve that clicks and passes air has a working coil, and the $65 part was never the fault. Buy it first and the code comes back.
Oil & Miles reads the regulation behind a code rather than the pages repeating each other about it, across symptoms and repair costs.
Common questions
Asked most often
What does the P0443 code mean?
The computer commanded the EVAP purge valve and didn't measure the current it expected on that circuit. It's an electrical result: an open coil, a short to ground or a short to power. It says nothing about whether vapor is flowing.
How do I fix a P0443 code?
Test the circuit before buying the valve. Twelve volts across the solenoid should give an audible click and airflow. A coil that reads open is the valve; a coil that works points at the fuse, the connector, the wiring or the module driver.
Can you drive with a P0443 code?
Mechanically, yes. There's no damage that accumulates with miles. You'll fail an emissions test where one is required, the readiness monitor won't complete, and the lit lamp can't warn you about the next fault.
How long can I drive with code P0443?
Until your next emissions test, in mechanical terms. The exception is a valve stuck open, which lets vapor into the intake and shows up as a rough idle or hard starting after refueling. That one has a symptom, and the symptom is the deadline.
How do I know if my purge valve is bad?
Energize it and listen. A working valve clicks, passes air while energized and holds when it's not. A valve that does neither, or whose coil reads open on a meter, is the fault. A valve that passes both tests isn't.
How much does it cost to fix?
The part is $65 at Ford's own list price and $33 mail order. The national average for the whole repair is $172, so roughly $107 of it is diagnosis and labor.
Where is the EVAP purge solenoid?
In the purge line, between the charcoal canister and the intake, and it's the only part in that line carrying an electrical connector. Follow the hose from the canister toward the engine. The exact spot differs by car, which is why nobody publishes one labor time for this job.
What is the difference between P0443 and P0441?
P0443 is the circuit. P0441 is the flow. One is measured with a meter on a wire, the other by watching what the vapor actually did, and they can appear together when one part causes both.
What people ask next
- P0174 Code: The Bank 2 Code That Isn't About Bank 2 14 min
- P0172 Code: The Searches Say Chevy, the Record Says CR-V 14 min
- P0700 Code: The One That Points at Another Code 15 min
- P0301 Code: A Plug, a Coil, or Coolant on a Ford 18 min
- P0441 Code: Why the Toyota Answer Is Usually Wrong 12 min
- P0442 Code: Why a New Gas Cap Often Changes Nothing 13 min
Sources
- 40 CFR 86.1806 and SAE J2012, for the code format and the failure type byte behind the GM suffix. We give no meaning for the value 00: those definitions live in the J2012-DA annex, which we haven't read. SAE International and the eCFR, read August 26, 2026
- California Code of Regulations, Title 13, section 1968.2, read at source, 81 pages. Subsection (e)(4.1) for the split between system monitoring and component monitoring, quoted in the panel above, and (e)(4.2.2) for the three system malfunctions. California Air Resources Board, read August 26 and re-read September 14, 2026
- CarMD Vehicle Health Index 2026, read as the published PDF, for the purge valve price and its national ranking. CarMD sells diagnostic tools, an interest worth naming, though the ranking is drawn from repair records rather than from anything it sells. CarMD.com Corp, read August 2026
- Ford dealer parts catalogue, for the purge valve: part AU5Z-9C915-E, $65 list and $40 at the catalogue's own discount, superseding AU5Z-9C915-A through -D and Motorcraft CX-2383, CX-2409, CX-2450 and CX-2470. A list price on one date, not a live price. FordPartsGiant, read August 29, 2026
- FordPartsGiant and NissanPartsDeal, for list prices on the other two cars: Ford 9U5Z-9C915-H and Nissan 14930-JA10D, read September 14, 2026. Numbers were matched by family, because both catalogues file vent solenoids under a purge valve heading: 9C915 and 14930 are purge, 9F945 and 14935 are vent.
- RockAuto, every brand listed for a 2015 Explorer 3.5L, a 2015 Escape 2.5L and a 2015 Altima 2.5L, read September 14, 2026. Left out: a Standard valve-and-hose assembly at $104, not the bare valve, and the Silverado, whose GM number the catalogue calls a vent valve.
- Ford's own monitor description for one application, a 2011 F-150 with the 3.7-liter V6. Read on a technician reference quoting the Ford text, because Ford's own workshop system refuses automated access; treated as one application, not a general specification. CarParts.com, quoting Ford service information, read August 29, 2026
- Owner threads on marque forums, for the distinctions owners draw and the twelve-volt test they pass between them. Used for the questions and the phrasing, never for the answers. Marque forums, read August 29, 2026
- The leak codes and the thresholds behind them are set out with their federal source in our own P0456 article, including the conditions the leak test has to meet before it can run at all. Oil & Miles, September 2026
How this was compiled
The complaint counts come from NHTSA's published bulk download rather than its search page, so the whole record is counted rather than a sample. The file is FLAT_CMPL, and the copy read here is dated 25 August 2026.
NHTSA files one row per component a complaint names, so the count is by complaint number rather than by row: across the 2010 to 2025 model years that is 645,169 complaints, of which twelve name this code. Complaints record what owners chose to report, which isn't the same measurement as how often a part fails.
Two counts come out of that file and they measure different things, so they're kept apart. Twelve complaints contain the string P0443. A second pass matches complaint text naming a purge valve or a purge solenoid, which is the part rather than the code, and returns 1,335 on the same model years: a complaint in that set may have been a flow code, a leak code or a stuck valve. Both are deduplicated by complaint number and filtered to model years 2010 to 2025, and neither is a failure rate.
The organizing idea isn't ours. The four checks are the four phrases the regulation itself uses when it hands individual valves and sensors to the comprehensive components requirements, and every EVAP code lands on one of them. Reading the rule before reading anybody's explanation is what showed that a circuit code and a leak code are different measurements that can't inform each other, which is the whole argument of this page.
The price is assembled from two ends rather than estimated. One end is a manufacturer's list price for a named part number; the other is a national average built from a count of repairs. The difference between them is what a reader is actually deciding about, and neither figure required an estimate generator.
What we didn't do
- We give no resistance value, voltage range or vacuum figure as a general specification for testing a purge valve. The figures on this page belong to one Ford application and are labeled that way. Numbers in circulation elsewhere are copied between sites without a source, and publishing one as though it were universal would be inventing a specification.
- We publish no labor time. Book hours for this job vary by where the valve sits, and we couldn't open a flat-rate guide we're entitled to quote. The $107 gap on this page is arithmetic between two figures we can show, not a labor estimate.
- We name no failure rate by make. Twelve complaints can't carry one, and the Chevrolet Volt pattern inside those twelve is written up as a lead rather than a finding for exactly that reason.
- We didn't scan a vehicle, test a circuit or replace a valve for this article. The regulation, the parts catalogue and the repair data are read at source and cited; nothing here is presented as first-hand experience.
- We recommend no brand of valve, connector or scan tool, here or anywhere on the site.
Prices are ranges compiled in September 2026 for the US market and vary by region, engine and shop rate. Prices from $10 up are rounded to the nearest dollar, so $14.13 reads as $14 and $14.52 as $15. Below $10 they're exact. This article is general information, not advice about your specific vehicle, see the disclaimer.
Purge valve
2015 Ford Explorer 3.5L V6
| Brand | Part | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Dorman | 911222 | $18 |
| SKP | SKCX2695 | $18 |
| Wells | 2M1271 | $20 |
| MotoRad | EVP1501 | $22 |
| Holstein | 2VCV0021 | $23 |
| Autotecnica | FD0323754 | $27 |
| Standard Motor Products | CP758 | $32 |
| Gates | PV406 | $33 |
| Motorcraft | CX2695 | $33 |
Purge valve
2015 Ford Escape 2.5L L4
| Brand | Part | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Dorman | 911222 | $18 |
| SKP | SKCX2695 | $18 |
| Wells | 2M1271 | $20 |
| MotoRad | EVP1501 | $22 |
| Holstein | 2VCV0021 | $23 |
| Autotecnica | FD0323754 | $27 |
| Standard Motor Products | CP597 | $32 |
| Motorcraft | CX2626 | $33 |
| Gates | PV410 | $36 |
| VEMO | V25770159 | $41 |
Purge valve
2015 Nissan Altima 2.5L L4
| Brand | Part | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Beck/Arnley | 0460164 | $57 |
| Dorman | 911509 | $58 |
| SKP | SK911509 | $64 |
| Gates | PV425 | $72 |
| Wells | 2M1288 | $74 |
| MotoRad | EVP0030 | $81 |